Erratum
The authors regret the incorrect version of Fig. 2 was included in the original manuscript. The correct version of Fig. 2 is as shown below, where ref. 188, 189, 190, 138 and 177 from the original article, are shown as ref. 1–5, respectively.(Figure Presented).The Royal Society of Chemistry apologis...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | , , , |
| Format: | other |
| Language: | eng |
| Published: |
2021
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10362/113693 |
| Country: | Portugal |
| Oai: | oai:run.unl.pt:10362/113693 |
| Summary: | The authors regret the incorrect version of Fig. 2 was included in the original manuscript. The correct version of Fig. 2 is as shown below, where ref. 188, 189, 190, 138 and 177 from the original article, are shown as ref. 1–5, respectively.(Figure Presented).The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers. |
|---|