Erratum
The authors regret the incorrect version of Fig. 2 was included in the original manuscript. The correct version of Fig. 2 is as shown below, where ref. 188, 189, 190, 138 and 177 from the original article, are shown as ref. 1–5, respectively.(Figure Presented).The Royal Society of Chemistry apologis...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Outros Autores: | , , , |
| Formato: | other |
| Idioma: | eng |
| Publicado em: |
2021
|
| Assuntos: | |
| Texto completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10362/113693 |
| País: | Portugal |
| Oai: | oai:run.unl.pt:10362/113693 |