Performance Comparison of Field-oriented Control, Direct Torque Control, and Model-predictive Control for SynRMs

Simulation studies of three synchronous reluctance motor (SynRM) control strategies are presented: field-oriented control (FOC), direct torque control (DTC), and finite-set model-predictive control (FS-MPC). FOC uses linear controllers and pulse-width modulation to control the fundamental components...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hadla, Hazem (author)
Other Authors: Santos, Fernando (author)
Format: article
Language:eng
Published: 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10400.19/7255
Country:Portugal
Oai:oai:repositorio.ipv.pt:10400.19/7255
Description
Summary:Simulation studies of three synchronous reluctance motor (SynRM) control strategies are presented: field-oriented control (FOC), direct torque control (DTC), and finite-set model-predictive control (FS-MPC). FOC uses linear controllers and pulse-width modulation to control the fundamental components of the load voltages vectors. In contrast, DTC and FS-MPC are nonlinear strategies wherein the voltage vectors are directly generated in the absence of a modulator. Theoretical operating principles and control structures of these control strategies are presented. Moreover, a comparative analysis of the static and dynamic performance of the control strategies is conducted using Matlab/Simulink to identify their advantages and limitations. It is confirmed that each of the control strategies has merits and that all three of them satisfy the requirements of modern high-performance drives.