Authentic leadership and performance: the mediating role of employees’ affective commitment

Purpose - This study aims to examine the relationship between authentic leadership (AL), affective commitment and individual performance. More specifically, this study aims to understand how (a) AL influences employees' affective commitment, (b) AL influences individual performance, (c) Affecti...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor principal: Ribeiro, Neuza (author)
Outros Autores: Gomes, Daniel (author), Kurian, Shaji (author)
Formato: article
Idioma:eng
Publicado em: 2018
Assuntos:
Texto completo:http://hdl.handle.net/10400.8/3409
País:Portugal
Oai:oai:iconline.ipleiria.pt:10400.8/3409
Descrição
Resumo:Purpose - This study aims to examine the relationship between authentic leadership (AL), affective commitment and individual performance. More specifically, this study aims to understand how (a) AL influences employees' affective commitment, (b) AL influences individual performance, (c) Affective commitment influences individual performance and (d) Affective commitment mediates the relationship between AL and Individual Performance. Design/methodology/approach - Two hundred and twelve Portuguese employees participated in this study. A quantitative methodology was used. Baron and Kenny’s linear regression method and Sobel test were used to test the mediation relationship. Findings - The results reveal that affective commitment mediates the relationship between AL and employees’ performance. In others words, leaders’ authenticity promotes employees’ affective commitment which, in turn, increases their individual performance. Practical implications - This research has practical implications for human resources management in organizations, particularly in selection processes and training of leaders and managers. Practitioners looking to increase employee commitment and performance can do so by augmenting the AL. Originality/value – This study enriches the knowledge about the relevance of emerging area such as AL theory and responds to the need to understand underlying mechanisms linking AL with workers’ commitment and performance (i.e., testing the construct’s nomological network).