Why valence is not enough in the study of emotions: behavioral differences between regret and disappointment
This paper reflects on the role of emotions in decision-making. The authors stress the limitations of a valence (“positivity” versus “negativity”) based approach. Emotions and their experiential content are synthetically exposed. Research has shown that even closely related emotions - such as regret...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Outros Autores: | , |
| Formato: | article |
| Idioma: | eng |
| Publicado em: |
2008
|
| Assuntos: | |
| Texto completo: | http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0874-20492008000200007 |
| País: | Portugal |
| Oai: | oai:scielo:S0874-20492008000200007 |
| Resumo: | This paper reflects on the role of emotions in decision-making. The authors stress the limitations of a valence (“positivity” versus “negativity”) based approach. Emotions and their experiential content are synthetically exposed. Research has shown that even closely related emotions - such as regret and disappointment -, whether anticipated or experienced, have differential influences on the behavior of decision makers. This favours emotion-specific research in decision-making context, i.e., the pragmatic “feeling-is-for-doing” approach. We believe the emotional system is the primary motivational system for goal-directed behavior. |
|---|