Runoff and inter-rill erosion in a maritime pine and a eucalypt plantation following wildfire and terracing in north-central portugal

The purpose of this study was to assess how terracing affected overland\nflow and associated sediment losses, at the micro-plot scale (0.25\nm(2)), in recently burnt stands of the two principal forest types in\nnorth-central Portugal, i.e. mono-specific stands of Maritime Pine and\nEucalypt. Terraci...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor principal: Martins, Martinho A. S. (author)
Outros Autores: Machado, Ana I. (author), Serpa, Dalila (author), Prats, Sergio A. (author), Faria, Sílvia R. (author), Varela, María E. T. (author), González-Pelayo, Óscar (author), Keizer, J. Jacob (author)
Formato: article
Idioma:eng
Publicado em: 2018
Assuntos:
Texto completo:http://hdl.handle.net/10773/24435
País:Portugal
Oai:oai:ria.ua.pt:10773/24435
Descrição
Resumo:The purpose of this study was to assess how terracing affected overland\nflow and associated sediment losses, at the micro-plot scale (0.25\nm(2)), in recently burnt stands of the two principal forest types in\nnorth-central Portugal, i.e. mono-specific stands of Maritime Pine and\nEucalypt. Terracing is an increasingly common practice of slope\nengineering in the study region but its impacts on runoff and erosion\nare poorly studied. Non-terraced plots at the Eucalypt and the Pine site\nrevealed similar median runoff coefficients (rc: 20-30%) as well as\ncomparable median sediment losses (15-25 g m(-2)) during the first seven\nmonths following wildfire. During the ensuing, slightly wetter 18-month\nperiod, however, non-terraced plots at the Pine site lost noticeably\nmore sediments (in median, 90 vs. 18 g m(-2)), in spite the runoff\nresponse had remained basically the same (median rc: 33 vs. 28%). By\ncontrast, terraced plots at the same Pine site lost hugely more\nsediments (in median, 1,200 g m(-2)) during this 18-month period.\nTerraced plots at the Eucalypt site even lost three times more sediments\n(in median, 3,600 g m(-2)). Ground cover and resistance to shear stress\nseemed to be key factors in the observed/inferred impacts of terracing.