| Summary: | Abstract The objective of this essay is to carry out a comparative study of the conflicts of jurisdiction resulting from litigations in the internet environment, taking as paradigms (1) the case of the European Court of Justice of 6 October 2015, case C 362/14; (2) Special Appeal n. 1,168,547, judged in February 2011, by the Brazilian Superior Court of Justice and (3) Direct Constitutionality Action N. 51, pending before the Supreme Federal Court of Brazil. Furthermore, it studies the adequacy, foreseen in the principiological catalog of Law 13.709/2018 as an assumption of validity for the international transfer of data. The anachronism of adherence to the territory as a criterion for defining jurisdiction, in such cases, is the work hypothesis. This essay uses, in the approach, the hypothetical-deductive method; in research, the typological and structuralist procedure; topic-systematic interpretation using exploratory and explanatory research techniques, instrumentally documentary (bibliographic and jurisprudential).
|
|---|