A framework for group decision-making: Including cognitive and affective aspects in a MCDA method for alternatives rejection
© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019. With the evolution of the organizations and technology, Group Decision Support Systems have changed to support decision-makers that cannot be together at the same place and time to make a decision. However, these systems must now...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Outros Autores: | , , , |
| Formato: | conferencePaper |
| Idioma: | eng |
| Publicado em: |
2019
|
| Assuntos: | |
| Texto completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/1822/68098 |
| País: | Portugal |
| Oai: | oai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/68098 |
| Resumo: | © Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019. With the evolution of the organizations and technology, Group Decision Support Systems have changed to support decision-makers that cannot be together at the same place and time to make a decision. However, these systems must now be able to support the interaction between decision-makers and provide all the relevant information at the most adequate times. Failing to do so may compromise the success and the acceptance of the system. In this work it is proposed a framework for group decision using a Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis method capable of identify inconsistent assessments done by the decision-maker and identify alternatives that should be rejected by the group of decision-makers. The proposed framework allows to present more relevant information throughout the decision-making process and this way guide decision-makers in the achievement of more consensual and satisfactory decisions. |
|---|