| Resumo: | Although leadership investigation has become for the last years an election topic with major relevance on organizational studies and accepting peacefully the general idea that organizations are freeland for politics and power maneuvers, knowing that decisions that came abroad from that “boiling can” are not always pursuiting the common welfare, all these acceptances run against a kind of “fear” from the academy scholars on approaching the political leaderships singularities on organizations. Indeed, when we cross over both phenomena we verify that, surprisingly, a prior investigation century left a richfull heritage of outcomes and valid conclusions, fact that has turned bigger and bigger as we watch the multiplicity of studies based under rationality standards, consented silences, the absence and weaknesses towards the unique characteristics of politic leadership on work scenarios are becoming sharped regarding to their predictors, their workers and their organizations, even if we left aside its moderator and mediator variables.
|
|---|