COMMENTARY ON COMMENTARIES: A SPACE FOR DIALOGUE AMONG DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVES
In this commentary we discuss our reactions towards the six contributions on our article “The psychotherapist’s social role under a dialogical perspective: A study of the personal construction of «I as psychotherapist»” (in this issue). These commentaries discuss a multiplicity of problems and poten...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Outros Autores: | , |
| Formato: | article |
| Idioma: | eng |
| Publicado em: |
2013
|
| Assuntos: | |
| Texto completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10174/8376 |
| País: | Portugal |
| Oai: | oai:dspace.uevora.pt:10174/8376 |
| Resumo: | In this commentary we discuss our reactions towards the six contributions on our article “The psychotherapist’s social role under a dialogical perspective: A study of the personal construction of «I as psychotherapist»” (in this issue). These commentaries discuss a multiplicity of problems and potentials, providing us with a meaningful space for dialogue among our multiple and sometimes discrepant perspectives. We have organized our reaction around three issues: (1) the importance of context influence on the process of being a psychotherapist; (2) the use of the motives as a tool to organize the psychotherapists’ diversity; and (3) the methodology for studying the dialogical processes. |
|---|