| Resumo: | Child-maltreatment has long been recognized as a serious and prevalent social problem with multiple and long-term consequences for child development. This work examines child-maltreatment based on a Social Information Processing model, emphasizing the role of cognitive representations, and errors and biases in processing caregiving-related information on parental responses. Six articles present (a) a set of meta-analyses about the relation between parents’ socio-cognitive variables and child-maltreatment, (b) a systematic review of implicit measures to assess parental cognitions in the context of maltreatment; (c) map and compare cognitive representations about parenting of referred and non-referred mothers; and (d) examine the association of implicit and explicit parental attitudes and (e) errors in emotion recognition, with self- and professionals-reported child abuse and neglect. The results of the reviews indicated that the associations of parental schemata and biased information processing with child maltreatment are significant, as well as that the potential of implicit measures in assessing parental cognitions may be valuable. Moreover, the empirical studies support the hypothesis that maladaptive parenting is characterized by rigidity schemata and associated with inadequate parental attitudes and errors in perceiving children’s emotional signals, but mostly for neglect and particularly when hetero-reported. Theoretically, these findings support the SIP model and emphasize the potential utility of socio-cognitive approaches in the evaluation and explanation of child maltreatment. The reported studies also represent a valuable methodological approach for assessing both maltreatment and parental cognitions. Overall, this work presents a contribution to the still emerging research about parental cognitions in the context of child maltreatment, with important implications for research and intervention.
|
|---|