Counterfactuals as Strict Conditionals
This paper defends the thesis that counterfactuals are strict conditionals. Its purpose is to show that there is a coherent view according to which counterfactuals are strict conditionals whose antecedent is stated elliptically. Section 1 introduces the view. Section 2 outlines a reply to the main a...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Idioma: | eng |
| Publicado em: |
2016
|
| Assuntos: | |
| Texto completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10451/24940 |
| País: | Portugal |
| Oai: | oai:repositorio.ul.pt:10451/24940 |
| Resumo: | This paper defends the thesis that counterfactuals are strict conditionals. Its purpose is to show that there is a coherent view according to which counterfactuals are strict conditionals whose antecedent is stated elliptically. Section 1 introduces the view. Section 2 outlines a reply to the main argument against the thesis that counterfactuals are strict conditionals. Section 3 compares the view with a proposal due to Åqvist, which may be regarded as its direct predecessor. Section 4 explains how the view differs from contextualist strict conditional accounts of counterfactuals. Finally, section 5 addresses the thorny issue of disjunctive antecedents. |
|---|