The Ibero-Armorican arc: indentation versus self-subduction

In the Iberian Variscides it is possible to distinguish major arcuate structures; although highly studied, their characterization and genesis are still a matter of controversy. The main Ibero- Armorican Arc (IAA) is essentially defined by a NW–SE trend in the Iberian branch and an E–W trend in the B...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dias, Rui (author)
Other Authors: Ribeiro, António (author), Coke, Carlos (author), Moreira, Noel (author), Romão, Manuel (author)
Format: lecture
Language:por
Published: 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10174/14014
Country:Portugal
Oai:oai:dspace.uevora.pt:10174/14014
Description
Summary:In the Iberian Variscides it is possible to distinguish major arcuate structures; although highly studied, their characterization and genesis are still a matter of controversy. The main Ibero- Armorican Arc (IAA) is essentially defined by a NW–SE trend in the Iberian branch and an E–W trend in the Brittany branch; however, in northern Spain it is rotated 180º, sometimes known as the Cantabrian Arc (CA). The relationship between these arcs is debatable, being considered either as a single arc generated in one tectonic event, or the result of polyphase bending process. According to the last assumption, there is a later arcuate structure (CA), overlapping a previous major one (IAA). Whatever the proposed models, they must explain the presence of a sinistral transpression regime in Iberia and a dextral one in Armorican branch, and the temporal deformation range of Devonian to Upper Carboniferous (Dias and Ribeiro, 1995).