A comparison of message exchange patterns in BFT protocols: (experience report)

The performance and scalability of byzantine fault-tolerant (BFT) protocols for state machine replication (SMR) have recently come under scrutiny due to their application in the consensus mechanism of blockchain implementations. This led to a proliferation of proposals that provide different trade-o...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor principal: Silva, Fábio (author)
Outros Autores: Alonso, Ana (author), Pereira, José (author), Oliveira, Rui Carlos Mendes de (author)
Formato: conferencePaper
Idioma:eng
Publicado em: 2020
Assuntos:
Texto completo:http://hdl.handle.net/1822/72241
País:Portugal
Oai:oai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/72241
Descrição
Resumo:The performance and scalability of byzantine fault-tolerant (BFT) protocols for state machine replication (SMR) have recently come under scrutiny due to their application in the consensus mechanism of blockchain implementations. This led to a proliferation of proposals that provide different trade-offs that are not easily compared as, even if these are all based on message passing, multiple design and implementation factors besides the message exchange pattern differ between each of them. In this paper we focus on the impact of different combinations of cryptographic primitives and the message exchange pattern used to collect and disseminate votes, a key aspect for performance and scalability. By measuring this aspect in isolation and in a common framework, we char acterise the design space and point out research directions for adaptive protocols that provide the best trade-off for each environment and workload combination.