CdS and Zn1−xSnxOy buffer layers for CIGS solar cells

Thin film solar cells based on Cu(In,Ga)Se2 (CIGS), where just the buffer layer is changed, were fabricated and studied. The effects of two different buffer layers, CdS and ZnxSn1-xOy (ZnSnO), are compared using several characterization techniques. We compared both devices and observe that the ZnSnO...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Salomé, P. M. P. (author)
Other Authors: Keller, J. (author), Törndahl, T. (author), Teixeira, J. P. (author), Nicoara, N. (author), Andrade, R. Ribeiro (author), Stroppa, D. G. (author), González, J. C. (author), Edoff, M. (author), Leitão, J. P. (author), Sadewasser, S. (author)
Format: article
Language:eng
Published: 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10773/30567
Country:Portugal
Oai:oai:ria.ua.pt:10773/30567
Description
Summary:Thin film solar cells based on Cu(In,Ga)Se2 (CIGS), where just the buffer layer is changed, were fabricated and studied. The effects of two different buffer layers, CdS and ZnxSn1-xOy (ZnSnO), are compared using several characterization techniques. We compared both devices and observe that the ZnSnO-based solar cells have similar values of power conversion efficiency as compared to the cells with CdS buffer layers. The ZnSnO-based devices have higher values in the short-circuit current (Jsc) that compensate for lower values in fill factor (FF) and open circuit voltage (Voc) than CdS based devices. Kelvin probe force microscopy (KPFM) results indicate that CdS provides junctions with slightly higher surface photovoltage (SPV) than ZnSnO, thus explaining the lower Voc potential for the ZnSnO sample. The TEM analysis shows a poly-crystalline ZnSnO layer and we have not detected any strong evidence of diffusion of Zn or Sn into the CIGS. From the photoluminescence measurements, we concluded that both samples are being affected by fluctuating potentials, although this effect is higher for the CdS sample.