Errata for Three Papers (2004-05) on Fixed-Priority Scheduling with Self-Suspensions

The purpose of this article is to (i) highlight the flaws in three previously published works [Audsley, 2004a; Audsley, 2004b; Bletsas, 2005] on the worst-case response time analysis for tasks with self-suspensions and (ii) provide straightforward fixes for those flaws, hence rendering the analysis...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor principal: Bletsas, Konstantinos (author)
Outros Autores: Audsley, Neil (author), Huang, Wen-Hung (author), Chen, Jian-Jia (author), Nelissen, Geoffrey (author)
Formato: article
Idioma:eng
Publicado em: 2019
Assuntos:
Real-time
Scheduling
Self-suspension
Worst-case response time analysis
Texto completo:http://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/12540
País:Portugal
Oai:oai:recipp.ipp.pt:10400.22/12540
Descrição
Resumo:The purpose of this article is to (i) highlight the flaws in three previously published works [Audsley, 2004a; Audsley, 2004b; Bletsas, 2005] on the worst-case response time analysis for tasks with self-suspensions and (ii) provide straightforward fixes for those flaws, hence rendering the analysis safe.

Registros relacionados