Brain SPECT in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy: comparison between visual analysis and SPM

OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy of SPM and visual analysis of brain SPECT in patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE). METHOD: Interictal and ictal SPECTs of 22 patients with MTLE were performed. Visual analysis were performed in interictal (VISUAL(inter)) and ictal (VISUAL(ictal/inter)...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor principal: Amorim,Bárbara Juarez (author)
Outros Autores: Ramos,Celso Darío (author), Santos,Allan Oliveira dos (author), Lima,Mariana da Cunha Lopes de (author), Min,Li Li (author), Camargo,Edwaldo Eduardo (author), Cendes,Fernando (author), Etchebehere,Elba Cristina Sá de Camargo (author)
Formato: article
Idioma:eng
Publicado em: 2010
Assuntos:
Texto completo:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-282X2010000200001
País:Brasil
Oai:oai:scielo:S0004-282X2010000200001
Descrição
Resumo:OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy of SPM and visual analysis of brain SPECT in patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE). METHOD: Interictal and ictal SPECTs of 22 patients with MTLE were performed. Visual analysis were performed in interictal (VISUAL(inter)) and ictal (VISUAL(ictal/inter)) studies. SPM analysis consisted of comparing interictal (SPM(inter)) and ictal SPECTs (SPM(ictal)) of each patient to control group and by comparing perfusion of temporal lobes in ictal and interictal studies among themselves (SPM(ictal/inter)). RESULTS: For detection of the epileptogenic focus, the sensitivities were as follows: VISUAL(inter)=68%; VISUAL(ictal/inter)=100%; SPM(inter)=45%; SPM(ictal)=64% and SPM(ictal/inter)=77%. SPM was able to detect more areas of hyperperfusion and hypoperfusion. CONCLUSION: SPM did not improve the sensitivity to detect epileptogenic focus. However, SPM detected different regions of hypoperfusion and hyperperfusion and is therefore a helpful tool for better understand pathophysiology of seizures in MTLE.